| Can India
Achieve What China Already Has? Not at present pace. We have to think
big!
China and India are both ancient civilizations with history dating
back over 5000 years. With ingenuity, vigour and pioneering spirit,
the Chinese and Indian people have made a major contribution to
human progress by creating two splendid civilizations. A glance
through their time-honoured past vividly reflects the originality,
greatness and profound richness of the two. During the last two
centuries, the two Asian giants fell far behind the rapidly growing
economies of North America and Western Europe. At the beginning
of nineteenth century, China generated about one third of world’s
total output and India about one sixth (calculated at common international
prices). The situation looked completely different by the mid-twentieth
century with China and India’s share plummeting to 5 and 3 percent
respectively. At the time of respective independence in mid twentieth
century, China became a Communist nation and India became the world’s
largest democracy. Despite differences in political ideology and
framework, both the nations chose socialist economics. With the
fear of subordination to foreign economic interests after having
gone through colonialism through the nineteenth century, both the
nations perceived capitalism as inefficient and unjust. However,
both failed to reach sufficiency through the socialist model. Even
till 30 years later, neither country even began to regain their
deserved position. However, a lot has changed since then, particularly
after the implementation of reforms and opening-up program pioneered
by Deng Xiaoping in 1978 for China and by Manmohan Singh for India
in 1991. Both the nations have started to play catch up with Western
economies, with China doing far better than India. Between 1980
and 2000, Chinese economy grew at 9.5% a year as against 5.7% in
India. In fact, Chinese real GDP grew faster than any other economy
in the world over these two decades. China has undergone a profound
transformation. In a short span of 26 years from 1978 to 2004, China’s
GDP increased from US$ 147.3 billion to US$ 1.6494 trillion. The
foreign trade has risen from US$ 20.6 billion to US$ 1.1548 trillion
and foreign reserves increased from US$ 167 million to US$ 610 billion.
Basically, China has replicated the East Asian success story of
nations like South Korea and Japan.
India today is where China was in 1993 (in absolute GDP terms).
As against China’s growth through rapid industrialization, an increasingly
deregulated labour market and international competitiveness, India’s
growth has been services-oriented and almost jobless. On top of
that India’s gross national savings as percentage of gross national
income at 22 percent are half that of China. India’s trade in goods
as a percentage of gross domestic product at 21 percent is less
than half of China’s. In 2003, China’s single year foreign direct
investment of US$ 54 billion was far higher than India’s cumulative
stock of foreign direct investment at US$ 30.8 billion. While elite
education is well developed in India, India’s illiteracy rate is
five times higher than China’s. Over 97 percent of all Chinese children
have passed primary education as against about 50 percent in India.
In terms of infrastructure, the story is far more accentuated. Having
already developed a formidable lead, even now China is spending
eight times as much as India does on infrastructure. Even as a share
of GDP, it is spending three times as much. Although I am a very
proud Indian but my every visit to China, be it to a large city
like Shanghai or Shenyang or to a small city (albeit, there’s nothing
small in China or India!) like Hangzhou or Ningbo, has mostly evoked
two emotions, i.e. sheer admiration for China and shame for us Indians.
On a relative scale, our Banglorification sounds absolutely empty.
Overall, China has not only saved and invested far more, its exploitation
of global opportunities has been far better. There are lots of stories
about China’s imminent collapse through political implosion or economic
malaise from things like over 40 percent of bank loans being considered
bad. However a more likely scenario is that with its population
being more educated and skilled, its socio-economic transformation
being more profound, it is very likely that China will regain its
status as the world’s largest economy between 2020 and 2025. President
Hu Jintao declared at Fortune Global Forum in May 2005 that China
is looking at quadrupling its GDP to US$ 4 trillion with a per capita
income around US$ 3000 by the year 2020.
The idea here is not to undermine the progress India has made over
last two decades. It is only to humbly urge our leadership, both
political and corporate, to spend some quality time studying China
model and find the answers for: How and why has it happened this
way?
The Case Study of Market Development for Swiss Watches The story
is very similar to the one on socio-economic development. China
today, including Hong Kong, is the largest market in the world for
Swiss watches. Even excluding Hong Kong, it is the largest market
for many leading brands in the world. There are about 400 retailers
in China for whom more than 75% of revenue comes from Swiss watches,
whereas India has only 40 such retailers. The average size of watch
retail stores in China is 3000 sq ft as against India at 800 sq
ft. Moreover, out of the Chinese retailers selling Swiss watches,
32 of these stores are above 4000 sq ft in size, whereas in India
there is not even a single such shop above 2000 sq ft. There are
about 120 stand-alone boutiques for leading Swiss brands in China
as against only 18 in India, half of which belong to TAG Heuer,
a new entrant in the Indian market. An obvious reflection of this
infrastructure advantage is that the average revenue per shop in
China is more than 8 times that of Indian watch shops.
How and why has this happened?
Is it because India still has much higher tariff on import of watches?
Have the Swiss companies been biased towards investment in China?
Have some Swiss watch brands given a pass to India while investing
heavily in China? Although answers to all the above is yes, the
real answer lies somewhere else. China watch trade has undergone
a major transition over last 10 years. A large amount of capital
has been injected in creation of Swiss watches retail by state companies
as well as ethnic Chinese retail companies from Hong Kong. The two
state-owned companies, Sunlian and Harmony, have become the leading
players in East and South China respectively. Similarly, Time City,
Emperor and Oriental Groups from Hong Kong have opened 55 shops
between them selling primarily Swiss watches. To top these, Xinyu,
an erstwhile distributor of leading watch brands, lead by a charismatic
entrepreneur called Cheung Yu Ping has developed a retail chain.
This chain with more than hundred shops has already become Asia’s
largest. This major investment in creation of high quality watch
retail infrastructure by local private as well as state-owned enterprises
coupled with investment from Hong Kong based companies is the chief
variable that has made China market so big. These players are the
ones who have built Swiss watch brands in China and not the other
way around. It is true that reduction of Indian tariff on imports
will certainly fuel the growth of Swiss watches business in India.
It will even bring larger revenue collections for India in terms
of indirect as well as direct taxes. The tariff rationalization
would certainly excite the imagination of Swiss brands towards Indian
market as till now India has been quite low on relative priority.
However, much of the job has to be done by Indian watch trade.
First of all, they have to start thinking big. The so-called retail
chains of India, i.e. Johnson & Co with 3 shops, Watches of
Switzerland with 4 shops, Marcks & Co. with 2 shops or even
the new entrant Ethos with 5 shops are a mere shadow of their Chinese
counterparts. We just think and play too small. Given the history
and heritage of some and experience of others, they have far larger
potential. The story of Harmony Group is an interesting one and
can bring some analogy for India’s leading watch brand, Titan. Till
few years back, Harmony Group generated 95% of its revenue from
sale of its leading brand in the country called, Fiyata. Noticing
a sharp increase in consumption of Swiss watches, Harmony diversified
its portfolio to include retail of Swiss watches. Today, more than
60% of its revenue comes from this new activity. “If we had not
diversified well in time, we would have gone from the leading player
in the market to a marginal one” says Miss Fang Juan, General Manager
of Harmony Group. I genuinely believe Titan has the key to catapulting
Indian watch market to another level. Titan revolutionized the Indian
watch market in 1980’s so much so that leading brands of that time,
HMT and Allwyn are biting dust today. Time has come for Titan to
take another revolutionary step. If not, it will find it difficult
to satisfy the aspirations of almost 200 Titan franchisees, who
have seen their average cost per sq ft grow consistently whereas
average revenue per Titan watch has not kept pace with it. I respect
the fact that Titan could not have looked at this opportunity earlier
because till very recently a bulk of Swiss watches were imported
through grey channels. A Tata company with high ethics could not
have indulged into such nefarious activity. However, today things
have changed. Titan would serve itself well by offering Indian consumers
their high quality watches along with that of Swiss. Finally, it
is the consumer who should decide.
One would urge the Titan management team to have a deep look at
this opportunity. And if there are any doubts about the quantum
this opportunity could reach, a visit to China could open the eyes.
If Indian trade creates the infrastructure, they will all come.
I mean the Swiss brands to invest in the country as well as the
Indian consumers to buy more watches at home. It will be a great
national service too as India will end up collecting higher taxes,
save forex spent on watch purchases abroad, upgrade retailing standards,
generate employment through retail as well as after-sales service
and generate higher advertising revenues. Let us learn from the
Chinese Dragon on how to move bold and fast. And one thing is very
clear, once the Indian elephant starts dancing everyone else will
have to clear the floor!
|